Why is the day the standard unit of time for so many workshops, trainings and conferences. I think it's worth questioning.
I often find on training that you can have a really engaging morning, but the afternoon turns out to be exhausting. We got on a roll but then pushed too far. I quite like doing smaller, half-day chunks with space between for reflection. Maybe even shorter chunks.
At the other end, events are often transformed by being overnight. Everyone immediately worries about the costs of accommodation - but I feel there are huge rewards for having a group recreate together, sleep reflect and re-examine stuff in the morning.
Bonus link: Roland's sparky post about boring conferences.

Email me








Facebook/Johnnie Moore
Linkedin/Johnnie Moore
Twitter/johnniemoore
Last.fm/johnniemoore
Del.icio.us/johnniemoore
Technorati/johnniemoore
MyBlogLog/JohnnieM
Blog/Johnnie Moore
Comments (2)
I once went to a 18 person conference in Tucson with a number of academics. We had a two hour conversation in the morning from 10-12 and then a two hour conversation in the afternoon from 330-530 followed by some drinks and dinner and hanging out. It was the best run conference I've every participated in. Learned a lot and, even 8 years later, remember it well.
January 30, 2013 17:47 Permalink for comment
Great article thanks. It coincides with a Blog written this week called Project Management Training: Classroom vs mobile (http://bit.ly/XLbORW)
Your article seems to say yes, face to face however not simply 1 day but a day +; the plus could be one to one coaching, webinars, reading, homework, plus a process of bringing all of the learning back into the workplace such as another very short and directed workshop.
Good post and thanks
January 31, 2013 07:33 Permalink for comment