<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Johnnie Moore&apos;s Weblog</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>johnnie@johnniemoore.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-01-30T12:23:46+00:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Change myths</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002375.php</link>
<description>This HBR post attempts to evaluate Obama&apos;s record on change management, based on a four step model. I&apos;m instinctively wary of models and this one strikes me as typically trite and questionable. The first step is to &quot;make the case...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2375@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Dr Rant</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-30T12:23:46+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>An approach to wicked problems</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002374.php</link>
<description>Matt Moore has posted a short and succinct paper about approaches to wicked problems. In my experience, lots of these problems get treated as if they are merely complicated and just need a solution from some (dubiously-qualified) expert. Here in...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2374@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-30T11:23:58+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A couple of interesting posts...</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002373.php</link>
<description>Rob has a couple of interesting posts up. He challenges how conversations about diversity reinforce stereotypes, in particular of the white male. And he describes an approach to cancer screening that relies on herd principles for success....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2373@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Miscellaneous (everything is)</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-30T09:41:48+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Acting into thinking</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002372.php</link>
<description>Nice post from Viv leading to this thought:We act our way into a new way of thinking, we don’t think our way into a new way of acting....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2372@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Miscellaneous (everything is)</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-29T12:08:10+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Liminality</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002371.php</link>
<description>Viv McWaters writes about liminality. When you’re asking me to change a particular behaviour (even if it’s for my own good, or for the well-being of others, or even the planet) you’re asking me to let go of something familiar...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2371@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-25T10:51:54+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Enough reinventing leadership, already</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002370.php</link>
<description> The title of Bob Sutton&apos;s latest post makes lots of sense to me:Most claims of originality are testimony to ignorance and most claims of magic are testimony to hubris.I share his weariness of efforts to radically &quot;reinvent leadership&quot;....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2370@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-21T09:49:32+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mush?</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002369.php</link>
<description>I&apos;ve just stumbled across Jaron Lanier&apos;s op ed from the WSJ: World Wide Mush. It&apos;s like a trailer for his new book, You are not a gadget. I found his argument confusing and a bit annoying. He seems to suggest...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2369@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-20T10:46:57+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management by being interested</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002368.php</link>
<description>Euan Semple &quot;Changing Innovation&quot; (lift09 France EN) from Lift Conference on Vimeo. Euan has posted his talk from LIFT last year. Good stuff, including his mini-rant against the costs of pomposity. I wanted to highlight the last chunk, starting around...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2368@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-20T01:10:08+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Innovation and control</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002367.php</link>
<description>Roland at NESTA writes about the problems faced by people in organisations responsible for open innovation.My colleague David Simoes-Brown likes to say that open innovation professionals are on the &apos;fringe of the fringe&apos; of their organisations. By this he means...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2367@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-19T09:17:18+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tangential creativity</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002366.php</link>
<description>Quite a few people have pointed to John Naughton&apos;s article: Lasers would never have shone if Mandelson had been in charge. Naughton challenges the government&apos;s plans to restrict science funding to applicants that can show &quot;demonstrable benefits to the economy,...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2366@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Tyranny of the explicit</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-18T07:21:33+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Next gen media</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002365.php</link>
<description>Antony Mayfield recommended Dan Calladine&apos;s presentation on Next Generation Media at Slideshare. Lots of interesting factoids about how the networked world is shaping up....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2365@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blogs &amp; networks</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-17T11:34:43+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>HR speak</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002364.php</link>
<description>My friend Julian Burton tweeted a link to this animation, which appears to be an unintentionally ironic commentary on the cliches of human resources....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2364@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Miscellaneous (everything is)</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-14T23:42:10+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Order from chaos</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002363.php</link>
<description>I&apos;ve just read Matthew May&apos;s book, In Pursuit of Elegance. It&apos;s an easy, succinct read and contains some engaging ideas. There&apos;s a fascinating section looking at the work of Jackson Pollock. It&apos;s an intricate story which I&apos;m shortening a little...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2363@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-14T23:27:58+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wave Rider</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002362.php</link>
<description>I&apos;ve just been reading Harrison Owen&apos;s Wave Rider. He explores the notion that human systems are fundamentally self-organising, with some interesting implications for how we view formal organisations. He refers to the work of Stuart Kauffman, a biologist interested in...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2362@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Facilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-12T21:45:02+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Complexity and the credit crunch</title>
<link>http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002361.php</link>
<description>Chris Mowles summarises Ralph Stacey&apos;s latest, very interesting, work. It resonates strongly for me.Organisations are not things but patterns of interactions between people. In these interactions, and among other things, people develop imaginative constructs of ‘wholes’ such as ‘the market’...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2361@http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/</guid>
<dc:subject>Miscellaneous (everything is)</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-01-11T23:09:00+00:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>