JP has a good post about how Open Source makes you responsible. He quotes Chuq van Rospach thus:
Open source requires you, as a manager of IT, or as a staffer, or as the CIO, to be willing to commit to being responsible for fixing a problem, and therefore, be responsible for the problem itself.I think this argument would apply in all sorts of other places, and I'd also take it a bit further.The support contract is not about fixing the problem. The support contract is about allowing you to shift responsibility for the problem. It is the tool that allows you to go (as the IT person, manager or organization) to the customer, or your manager, or the CIO, or the VP of whatever organization is pissed at you for the problem, and say “we’re doing everything I can, but we can’t fix it until we hear back from the vendor”.
I think it's a powerful shift when we stop seeing ourselves as separate from "the problem" and instead see ourselves as connected to it. Maybe seeing ourselves as part of a larger whole including "the problem", one of the ideas emphasised in Presence. It might lead us to wonder about the change we need to make - or allow - in ourselves and get beyond finger pointing.

Email me








Facebook/Johnnie Moore
Linkedin/Johnnie Moore
Twitter/johnniemoore
Last.fm/johnniemoore
Del.icio.us/johnniemoore
Technorati/johnniemoore
MyBlogLog/JohnnieM
Blog/Johnnie Moore