Kerplunk!

Meetings gain energy when someone addresses real emotions or conflicts, shifting vague ideas into action by embracing honest, human interactions instead of avoiding sensitive issues.
Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

specifics and emotions bring meetings to life

In the game Kerplunk, players remove sticks carefully to avoid releasing a cascade of balls—a metaphor for meetings where teams avoid discussing sensitive issues. People often stick to vague ideas about teamwork and communication, fearing emotional fallout.

However, meetings become more productive and energized when someone openly addresses a specific feeling or conflict. This honesty shifts the room’s dynamic, helping turn abstract ideas into concrete actions by acknowledging our genuine human emotions.

Transcript:

Do you know the children’s game Kerplunk? It involves a transparent plastic tube with a series of sticks halfway up, creating a mesh. On top of this mesh sits a set of plastic balls. In the game, players carefully remove sticks, hoping they won’t be the one to pull the critical stick that makes the mesh fail, causing all the balls to tumble down in a loud “Kerplunk!”

 

My friend Mark Bloomfield uses this game as a metaphor for what can happen in our meetings, where teams get stuck fiddling with the “sticks” of conversation, fearful of triggering an emotional “downfall.” In this metaphor, fiddling with the sticks means speaking in generalities and abstractions—saying we need better teamwork, less siloed work, or improved communication, without diving into specifics. Meanwhile, the “emotional balls” represent real challenges we face with specific people or emotions that feel unsafe to express.

 

During a meeting, we can keep fiddling with the sticks, leaving the emotional balls either stuck or teetering on the edge of collapse. I propose a different approach: meetings often come to life when someone decides to address one of those underlying emotional issues. This might mean sharing an unexpressed feeling or naming a conflict directly with someone in the room. Even a simple acknowledgment of an issue can shift the energy in the meeting.

 

When someone voices a specific concern or true emotion, you can feel the tension change—the meeting becomes more dynamic and engaging. This openness often gives momentum to the discussion, turning abstract ideas into actionable steps. Embracing our real, human emotions allows us to move forward, recognizing that we are complex, flesh-and-blood individuals—not mere automata following a script.

Share Post

More Posts

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

Leading from the clown

I shot this in a single eight-minute take, which is in the spirit of an experience of Ralf Wetzel’s workshop, Leading from the Clown. Clown training is probably the deepest and most challenging work I’ve done. Enjoy.

Noticing

The power of small gestures and noticing

Small p presence

Getting away from grandiosity or solemnity. small p presence is about being open to the life around us

Small i improv

Facilitation is often about small, subtle acts of noticing and experimenting

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Cloudmark

I’m currently trialling the Cloudmark’s SafetyBar anti-spam software, after learning about it from Chris Anderson. Here’s what interests me: at the moment, I am not plagued with Spam and the

Johnnie Moore

Reflecting on trying to impress

I’m making some more little videos reflecting on the business of working with people. This first one was prompted by looking at the sales pitches of training companies at a

Johnnie Moore

There is no point

I’m quite interested in the idea of things being pointless. This fabulous bit of co-creation (South Park meets Alan Watts) delights me. So many meetings start out with anxious lists

Johnnie Moore

Same difference?

I wonder if I am alone in being a little bored of conversations about the difference between ‘innovation’ and ‘creativity’. The same goes for ‘leadership’ and ‘management’. Most of the