Johnnie Moore

Hutton and faith in authority

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I’ve just had a conversation with my colleague Chris Pearse about the Hutton report. (Just published, Lord Hutton’s report into a scandal surrounding a government weapons expert Dr David Kelly, his leaking of information/opinion, the BBC’s reporting thereof, Kelly’s suicide)

Hutton has, in essence, cleared Tony Blair and his team of wrongdoing, and pointed the blame at the BBC. The government claims vindication; its former spin doctor savages the BBC. Some agree that the Beeb has been wicked; and others say the whole thing is a whitewash.

Whatever you may think of the content of the report, it’s already very apparent that its publication has not closed the book on the affair. What interests me is that people are surprised and upset that it hasn’t. I am no fan of our legal system and it comes as no surprise to me that a lawyer produces findings that cause a storm of protest. In fact, why do we create the expectation that any one person has the wisdom to deliver a defining view of complex evidence, as if somehow it’s not actually for all us to make our own mind up… as if we could all agree if only someone really clever could deliver us an absolute, unifying truth?

It seems to me that the inquiry itself was quite helpful, bringing into the public domain a whole mass of information about the normally opaque dealings of big organisations. That part I give Hutton some credit for. But do we really need him to interpret the evidence for us; and if he chooses to do so, wouldn’t it be better if he – and we – acknowledged that this is, of course, just his opinion. Of course Blair and his cohorts are now blustering about Hutton’s eminence, but they would say that wouldn’t they? Perhaps we’re now learning a lesson about the foolishness of believing in totally impartial justice from judges that the US learnt in its last presidential election.

Clearly, the UK is still in transition from the time of deference and trusting authority to the more exciting if challenging world of networks and conversations. Some regard this with dread and concern, I mostly celebrate it.

And I wonder how often organisations waste time waiting for “definitive reports” from expert consultants, in the false faith that someone else will solve the problem… instead of engaging in the far more interesting challenge of moving together with goodwill through the uncertainties of tribulations of our daily lives?

I also note the energy wasted in the adversarial bluster where people try to make others good or bad, instead of attending to the richer, less sharply defined truth… or indeed to the more interesting question of – where do we go from here? That is where the British legal and political systems, with their emphasis on an adversarial model and a celebration of “forensic” approaches to living systems, fail us quite badly.

The BBC, Tony Blair, the David Kelly’s family… they all have the same task today as they did yesterday… how do we move on from here productively? Was it really worth waiting for Lord Hutton’s personal judgement before doing so? I think not.

Share Post

More Posts

Rambling thoughts on models

I went down to Surrey on Friday for long walk and pub lunch with Neil Perkin. We’d originally planned to run a workshop about agile

Planning as drowning

Antonio Dias offers a fascinating description of what goes wrong when drowning: What separates a swimmer from someone drowning is the way a swimmer acknowledges

Leadership as holding uncertainty

Viv picks out some nice ideas from Phelim McDermott on the subject of leadership. “We love the security of the illusion that someone is in

Concreting Complexity

I’ve been thinking about the urge to scale things lately – see here and here. I understand the concern with being able to effect big

The absurd

In moving house, I radically downsized my collection of books which I can highly recommend. I used to think I’d one day find a reason

Rewriting history…

Thanks to my Improvisation friend Kelsey Flynn I rambled into a letter cited in Margaret Cho’s Blog (go to Letter #1): Lately it seems like

Who says fun is dangerous?

I wanted to share this email doing the rounds this morning… AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE After every flight Qantas pilots fill out a form called a gripe

Yes, and…

A quick ramble on the nature of paradox, inspired by a blog on the value of both fear of the new and curiosity

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations


Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

More Space – update

A quick update on the More Space project. Since my first stab outline I’ve been turning it over in my mind. 10,000 words drafted by mid-February is starting to feel

Johnnie Moore


Thanks to Tony Goodson (via Tom Peters) for this: “Managers are the dinosaurs of our modern organizational ecology. The Age of Management is finally coming to a close. The need

Johnnie Moore

Music business as nasty neighbours

I guess most of us growing up, had the grouchy-old-man neighbour? In Bishop’s Avenue, he lived a few doors along in the white bungalow hidden behind large bushes. He was