Assertiveness, aliveness and risking keeping it brief

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I can’t easily recall much about Covey’s Seven Habits. But I do recall his little diagram distinguishing between a person’s circle of concern and circle of influence. Like all models this is open to many different interpretations: some think we should focus on increasing our influence. Personally, I think it may be better to try to constrain our circle of concern.

This comes to mind as I reflect on many of my experiences coaching people around assertiveness. When we try to set a boundary for the other we often get anxious about how they may respond. So instead of saying “I don’t like X” we get all reasonable, prefacing our remark with reassurances about our goodwill for them, and suffixing it with all manner of qualifications like “,of course I may be wrong” or “,I realise that I’m partly responsible” etc etc.

Sugar coating has its uses, but it can be a bit of a con. We think we’re being considerate but actually our placatory behaviour is signalling “whatever you do, don’t be angry with me” or “I’m afraid of you*”. Either way, we’re not really being straight with the other, and we’re not setting much of a boundary at all – in fact, we’re quite likely to provoke an invasion of some kind.

So it’s often better to keep it really short, and take the risk of leaving the other person the task of managing their response. It’s more respectful – and once you get the hang of it (I’m still practicing) it’s much less work.

In improv, the short bold offer is usually the one that opens up the scene creatively. Players who go waffling on, are called “scriptwriters”. Clear offers invite spontaneity and they allow our relationship to be alive.

This links to my thoughts lately about “scaling systems”. When we extend our concern beyond our part of the system (and our relationship to it) we may think we’re being very reasonable but we may actually be separating ourself from it and it’s core quality – its life.

* Of course it may be that we are afraid of them. Sometimes we may not want to signal it – and sometimes it would be better to take the risk of saying it plain rather than signalling it inadvertently.

Share Post

More Posts

Singing on the subway

What I learned singing to strangers on the subway, and why emotional connections matters even more in a hi-tech era.

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

Leading from the clown

I shot this in a single eight-minute take, which is in the spirit of an experience of Ralf Wetzel’s workshop, Leading from the Clown. Clown training is probably the deepest and most challenging work I’ve done. Enjoy.

Noticing

The power of small gestures and noticing

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Culture vs Strategy

More punchy stuff from Mark at fouroboros: here’s how basic it really is. Choice titbits: 2. Understand that when guys like Harvard’s Schein and the London School of Economics’ Maister

Johnnie Moore

links for 2011-09-17

A Conversation With Fred Kent Leader in Revitalizing City Spaces – Samantha Michaels – Life – The Atlantic Community led development trumps iconic architecture. Beware "starchitects". "Take Frank Gehry's Guggenheim

Johnnie Moore

“Neutral” election coverage

Thoughtful piece by Jay Rosen (via David Weinberger) challenging conventional coverage of the US elections. The Every Four Years approach further pretends that the professional ideal of a neutral fact-finding,

Johnnie Moore

A new twist on transparency

Adam Curry is in mortal combat with his would-be broadband provider. After being in telephone-tennis with them for weeks now he proposes a new tactic. Record the conversations and podcast