A naturalistic approach to branding

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I so agree with Dave Snowden’s post: Branding: service is not a commodity

He recounts his experience as an ad agency client whilst he worked at IBM.

What would happen is that meetings would take place with O&M following detailed market research into customer needs. An image would then be created using some brilliant creatives which would result in a sophisticated advertising campaign. Staff would then be informed of the new image there might be some powerpoint briefings and a communication campaign but it was always an after thought. I also found it interesting that very senior managers would get wrapped up in the vision of the ideal and none of their direct, or indirect reports were prepared to say that the emperor has no clothes.

That’s exactly how a lot of advertising operates… by setting up ideals and absolutely not recognising how things are. It’s a failing not only of advertising, but of an awful lot of “change processes”. If we don’t recognise where we are, I believe we become alienated and less able to function well. We become courtiers to Mad King George addressing an oak tree as the King of Prussia.

Dave goes on to suggest a few dos and don’ts for how a service organisation might brand in a more naturalistic way. For some reason, this morning these don’ts resonate quite strongly for me:

DO NOT find examples of ideal behaviour and promulgate them as best practice. people will either thing you set them up, have not told the full story or will just say I couldn’t do that

DO NOT identify the three main obstacles to customer satisfaction and institute an organisational wide campaign to overcome them

DO NOT create a list of values and behaviours that you want staff to adopt and institute a training programme to install those routines in your employees. It will produce camouflage behaviour at best.

I’m not a fan of best practice and I’m very wary of any approach that appears to frame human beings as some kind of computers to be programmed with routines. Which may put me somewhat at odds with a lot of change programmes.

Share Post

More Posts

Ghost lights..

feeling the power of presence… and what it really means to ‘read the room.’

Singing on the subway

What I learned singing to strangers on the subway, and why emotional connections matters even more in a hi-tech era.

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Complicated and later?

Hugh Macleod sent an email today on the difference between complex and complicated. I liked this bit: The idea of simplicity in business has in recent years taken on a

Johnnie Moore

Improv Wisdom

I’ve posted a review of Improv Wisdom by Patricia Ryan Madson over at the Applied Improv Weblog.

Johnnie Moore

Conversations in layers

I stumbled on this crude graphic that I blogged back in 2004. I was making a point about a specific piece of marketing jargon, “brand architecture”. I think the same

Johnnie Moore

Not being a company

Harold Jarche has been reviewing his blog from 2004. That’s a fun thing to do I think. He found this apposite then – and it resonates well for me now.