Clay Shirky on process

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I enjoyed this from Clay Shirky: Process is an embedded reaction to prior stupidity. Clay’s not saying we shouldn’t have processes but he’s a minimalist, as am I.

Regret is one of our most powerful emotions, and it is magnified in groups. When organizations overshoot, they tend to overshoot in the direction of minimizing regret rather than maximizing capability…

Process is the feature creep of organizations. In the same way software has to have features, groups have to have process. But like software, process creep in groups is insidious — each additional check in or form seems to cost little and add much, but over time, the cumulative overhead of process can hamstring an organization, almost without their noticing.

Share Post

More Posts

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

Leading from the clown

I shot this in a single eight-minute take, which is in the spirit of an experience of Ralf Wetzel’s workshop, Leading from the Clown. Clown training is probably the deepest and most challenging work I’ve done. Enjoy.

Noticing

The power of small gestures and noticing

Small p presence

Getting away from grandiosity or solemnity. small p presence is about being open to the life around us

Small i improv

Facilitation is often about small, subtle acts of noticing and experimenting

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

One step at a time

I saw a lot of myself in Viv’s description of indecision and the wisdom of accepting offers and doing something… one step at a time.

Johnnie Moore

Marketing 0.0?

Years ago Alan Moore showed me a brilliant clip of Bill Hicks ripping Marketing a new one. I just found it on YouTube: (Warning: Not Work Safe!) I used this

Johnnie Moore

Debating Lovemarks

Meeting Brian Sweeney the Kiwi end of the Lovemarks team was interesting. We had a good-spirited dialogue about Lovemarks. As in, we were both willing to hear each other’s points