Realism = vulnerability

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I love the way Antonio Dias puts this:

it just struck me that the most realistic judgement of our selves would have to be a profound sensibility of our vulnerability. As soft-bodied creatures inhabiting a sharp-edged world we are physically vulnerable to all those “mortal shocks that plague” us. As emotional/mental creatures we pit a little over a thousand cc’s of gelatinous mass backed up by a plumbing of glands and their interacting secretions against a world of pain confusion and potential despair. We are vulnerable. To know this, and to abide it, must be the most “realistic” attitude we could take.

So often, I find the demand for “realism” comes packaged with some implicit harshness. Antonio, on the other hand, suggests kindness might be more appropriate. I think I agree.

Share Post

More Posts

Ghost lights..

feeling the power of presence… and what it really means to ‘read the room.’

Singing on the subway

What I learned singing to strangers on the subway, and why emotional connections matters even more in a hi-tech era.

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

What sucks?

I’m doing a talk on Wednesday and just for fun, looked up one of the companies attending on Google. I just searched on “(Name of company) sucks”. And what an

Johnnie Moore

Innovation or real needs?

Tim Kastelle has good post The Worst Innovation Quote Ever. That’s the one about inventing a better mousetrap and the world beating a path to your door. Apparently there are

Johnnie Moore

Difficult conversations, part 4

Here’s the latest espisode on Difficult Conversations. (Parts One Two and Three). I made this one with my friend Kay Scorah. We talk about arguments like “who left the top

Johnnie Moore

Shortcuts

Paul Goodison commented on my post about Fundamental Attribution Error. He asks: Isn’t that the point of (traditional) branding i.e. to provide a shortcut to decision making for consumers of