Action theatre

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

You may have come across the term security theatre, to describe, as Bruce Schneier puts it, “countermeasures that provide the feeling of security while doing little or nothing actually to improve security.”

In similar vein, at meetings, could we draw a distinction betwen action theatre and action?

I’m very familiar with participants expressing concern that there are actions, with several (but not all) heads nodding. There are rounds of calls for everyone to agree action points. And facilitators often end up standing by a flip chart scribbling them up and allocating them to participants. There’s no hard and fast rule, but all this often feels like action theatre to me. It gives an impression that lots of action is happening… but it turns out that a lot of the plans don’t seem to get beyond ideas on a flipchart.

(There’s also “priority theatre”, the variation around the theme of “we need to set some priorities here”)

I’m more excited when people talk about stuff that they want to do and offer to get started, without any prompting by the chairman/facilitator. In Open Space, you’ll often see ginger groups forming that start projects in the meeting itself and seem much more likely to continue outside. So when people call for “action” in the abstract, or for a process to make actions happen, I tend to ask them: what action do you personally want to see happen? Is there something you need to do yourself to make it happen?

I’m also quite content for meetings to engage in fierce arguments about what to do, and for those arguments to continue long enough for some new insights to emerge for participants – insights that might provide the ground for some wiser action in future. I’d also rather those arguments go unresolved than see foks grudgingly agreeing to “action points” where their agreement only really means, “I’m tired and I want to go home now” and not “Yes, that’s something I want to make happen”.

Afterthought. The term action theatre means something quite different in other contexts, such as these guys who would have a lot to share about what it is to embody action.

Share Post

More Posts

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

Leading from the clown

I shot this in a single eight-minute take, which is in the spirit of an experience of Ralf Wetzel’s workshop, Leading from the Clown. Clown training is probably the deepest and most challenging work I’ve done. Enjoy.

Noticing

The power of small gestures and noticing

Small p presence

Getting away from grandiosity or solemnity. small p presence is about being open to the life around us

Small i improv

Facilitation is often about small, subtle acts of noticing and experimenting

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Doubt as a form of enquiry

I like what Chris Mowles has to say about John Dewey and Doubt as a form of enquiry. Dewey was interested in experimentation and argued that traditions of thought, such

Johnnie Moore

Feed me

The Guardian has started its own version of the HuffPo comment is free. (They’re well ahead of most mainstream media in their embrace of the digitial, so I was surprised

Johnnie Moore

Acting into thinking

Nice post from Viv leading to this thought: We act our way into a new way of thinking, we don’t think our way into a new way of acting.

Johnnie Moore

Holding uncertainty

The other night I watched episode 5 of Wildest Dreams. It’s a BBC show in which two small teams of people compete to become wildlife film-makers. Like so many such