Johnnie Moore

Beyond Lovemarks: Modesty

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

(This is the first of a series of posts talking about alternative ways of creating brands that are socially useful and economically sustainable)

I want to talk about modesty a quality somewhat lacking in many branding practitioners and certainly in Kevin Roberts, whose book, Lovemarks, I and several others haven been protesting about lately.

The “great man” view of history

I imagine Roberts subscribes to the “great man” version of history. He speaks of the importance of the big gesture:

I have never believed that extraordinary results come from ordinary actions so I am attracted by extremes. I demonstrated the point when my Canadian Pepsi Team blew away Coke to become number one in the market. We celebrated by machine-gunning a Coke vending machine on stage at a conference. Risky? Yes. Stupid? Possibly. Memorable, inspiring? You bet.

This, of course, makes him ideally suited to be CEO of Saatchis. This agency has long sought to be the poster boy for the grandiose gesture. This is the agency that launched itself with a two-page manifesto in the Sunday Times, that took most of the credit for Margaret Thatcher’s election success in 1979, that gave us the iconic adverts for The World’s Favourite Airline. I have always doubted Saatchi’s credit for the success of these clients, but no-one could accuse them of advocating modesty.

Yet there is quite a lot of evidence that extraordinary results very often do come from ordinary actions. Jim Collins’ Good to Great provides ample evidence that ordinariness and being down-to-earth are common qualities of sustainably successful businesses and in particular of their CEOs.

I’m also reminded of Chris Corrigan’s reflections on the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia. This provided an awesome example of the revolutionary power of the cumulative, ordinary actions of ordinary people. Vaclav Havel describes how each time, for instance, a shopkeeper declined to have a “Workers of the World Unite” slogan in the window, they played their small part in dismantling the communist dictatorship.

Branding experts are not usually very modest

They say that history is written by the victors. They also say that success has many parents, while failure is an orphan. Put these two thoughts together and add to it branding people’s fondness for exaggeration, and you get trouble.

For every successful brand, there are a myriad of boastful individuals trying to take the credit – either for a supposed act of dramatic leadership in bringing it about, or for having cracked the secret formula that led to its success. Look at most agency websites and stories are almost always ones of a series of unmitigated triumphs.

Sadly, some clients are clawing around for the magic formula and easily fall prey to such approaches.

Yet most branding fails

But most branding is not successful. For every great brand you or I could nominate, there are probably thousands of also-rans. In my experience, these failures are quietly covered up, rationalised or scapegoated by their perpetrators. And, of course, go largely unnoticed by the rest of us.

Thus the story of branding is a tale usually told by an egotist, and thus we get the conventional narrative of heroic leadership, blinding customer insight blah blah blah.

Typically, it is told as a series of highly rational decisions made by insightful gurus.

Modesty may work better

The conventional response to our overnoisy media environment is to make even more noise. This, of course, is very much in some people’s financial interests. But I believe that powerful brands don’t need to brag. The ones that do only risk the wrath of disappointed customers who find them falling short.

Collins’ book has highlighted the role of the understated CEO. In his contrasting list of good-to-great and not-so-great companies, it was the latter whose CEO’s turned up on magazine covers.

My favourite evocation of a more modest version of success is the account given by Jason Porter, founder of Friends Reunited.

I urge you to watch him talk in this .wmv movie. (You might want to skip the 2m45s introduction). His story of this pheonomenally successful business is told as a chapter of accidents, guesses and near misses. He tells how they created Friends Reunited almost as an afterthought, with little expectation of success, and assuming that they should really be doing something else. It has a smack of authenticity that is often lacking in such accounts.


Sadly, modest people often fail to capture public attention. Immodest ones, like Kevin Roberts, are thus allowed an undue degree of attention. But if modesty works, surely we should not look to the likes of Roberts for guidance on how to create a successful brand.

Indeed, nor should you look to me or anyone else for that elusive, “How To” of branding. Because “How tos” belong in the boring world of best practice. (And as Ton Zijlstra recently pointed out, best practice generally leads to being second best at someone else’s game).

Perhaps it would be best to pay less attention to the noisy, confident brand experts and more attention to some of the quieter voices…

Another modest suggestion is that creating the next successful brand, or making your current one at least a tad more effective, is about being willing to take a step into the unknown. In such circumstances, the best companions will not be those who claim to know the unknown. Nor, in all likelihood, those with dubious but detailed rationalisations of other brands’ successes.

You’d be much better off travelling with those who are excited by the idea of exploring the new and will be good companions in that process. On which I shall no doubt be saying more soon?

Share Post

More Posts

Conversational leadership

David Gurteen tweeted this interesting article (pdf): Conversational Leadership: Thinking together for a change It makes a lot of sense to me pushing for a

Scaling or evolving?

This post really interests me: Innovation for Development: Scaling Up or Evolving? As they complete some pilot experiments in development work the authors recognise that


I’ve just given a presentation on Beyond Branding in Jersey. It was fun to take ideas that have been percolating for months and give them

Badgers and the joy of complexity

Great article in today’s Independent. The government decided to take action to stop the spread of TB among cattle. They found that badgers were to

More on what is marketing…

Jennifer Rice continues our rolling dialogue about what marketing’s job is. I appreciate Jen for keeping a good thoughtful exploration going. David Foster at PhotonCourier


I’ll be taking part in the Chautauqua online discussion of Beyond Branding, from 15th to 29th February. Fellow authors Denzil Meyers, Chris Macrae, Julie Anixter

Microsoft’s embarassing metadata

Found via Richard Gayle is Strike that Out Sam. This is a cheeky exploitation of the fact that Microsoft Word documents retain the fingerprints of

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations


Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

On moralising and meaning-making

I’ve been thinking a lot about moralising lately. By that I mean the creating of rules or principles for our conduct. I’ve been thinking about it a lot since reading

Johnnie Moore

Costs and quality

From the new (and rather good) Four Groups Blog: Costs and Quality. Bruce Lewin spotted this on the mailing list of UK-HRD. Nothing personal – this happens every couple of

Johnnie Moore

Not solving the problem

Mark at Anecote has a good post on not solving the problem. We generally find with complex issues that once you go into ‘problem solving mode’ you start heading down

Johnnie Moore

Inauthentic marketing: case study

An example of inauthentic direct mail, from Lincoln Financial Group. The elements that eat away at the credibility of the sender and the effect on this reader.