Johnnie Moore

Scaling or evolving?

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

This post really interests me: Innovation for Development: Scaling Up or Evolving?

As they complete some pilot experiments in development work the authors recognise that this is where they are expected to “scale up”. But they question whether the scaling notion really applies in complex situations:

We found this type of linear, manufacturing-style approach of running-one-good-project-and-then-exporting-it-to-someplace-else not in line with some of our own experience in applying complexity science in projects:

They quote Anna Davies of the Young Foundation:

… the concept of scaling has strong connotations of standardization. It has its origins in manufacturing, where the aim is to achieve economies of scale, by spreading fixed costs across more units of output. But in the messy social field, the potential for standardization is more limited. Here, concepts of reinvention and adaptation will be at least as important, if not more so, than standardization. Social outcomes are not products that can be easily made to formula and packaged. This is especially clear in the context of innovation in public services.

They go on to make some interesting contrasts with the process of evolution. It’s interesting that so many people struggle with the theory of evolution, wanting desperately to impose the order of intelligent design upon it. I see the same struggle played out when it comes to organisational change, where appeals to leadership and other abstractions distract from the real challenges of living in a frusratingly complex, apparently rather dysfunctional world.

And I’ve written before about the adverse consequences of the urge to scale.

I see this in efforts, for example, to “embed values” in large groups of people, as if this some simple mechanical process. My experience is that people’s values are actually more fluid than they admit, sensitive to context and fluctuation. When people talk about their values, it’s basically their rational mind simplifying a whole mess of experiences which are actually affected by a whole series of other factors they’re barely aware of. (Daniel Kahneman cites many of these, including the observation that Judges impose harsher sentences when hungry).

Social change is, surprise, a social process, not a mechanical one. I get very fidgety when people set themselves up as experts in behaviour change as if this mostly a question of analysis and cleverness. They risk seeing themselves as outside the system, lacking the humility to realise how prone they themselves are to biases of all kinds, and underestimating the complexity of the processes they want to initiate.

I suppose I’m influenced by having spent a lot of time in therapy groups watching people (myself especially) struggling, frustratedly trying to change themselves or significant others. It’s a tough, unpredictable process. That’s just individual change. I struggle to see how organisational change can be anything other than a tough, frustrating, process to be engaged with in a spirit of considerable humility. Ambition is fine, but with humility, please.

Hat tip: Tony Quinlan’s tweet

Share Post

More Posts

Conversational leadership

David Gurteen tweeted this interesting article (pdf): Conversational Leadership: Thinking together for a change It makes a lot of sense to me pushing for a


I’ve just given a presentation on Beyond Branding in Jersey. It was fun to take ideas that have been percolating for months and give them

Badgers and the joy of complexity

Great article in today’s Independent. The government decided to take action to stop the spread of TB among cattle. They found that badgers were to

More on what is marketing…

Jennifer Rice continues our rolling dialogue about what marketing’s job is. I appreciate Jen for keeping a good thoughtful exploration going. David Foster at PhotonCourier


I’ll be taking part in the Chautauqua online discussion of Beyond Branding, from 15th to 29th February. Fellow authors Denzil Meyers, Chris Macrae, Julie Anixter

Microsoft’s embarassing metadata

Found via Richard Gayle is Strike that Out Sam. This is a cheeky exploitation of the fact that Microsoft Word documents retain the fingerprints of

Iranian Blog

On a tip from David Weinberger I’ve been reading the blog written by the Vice President of Iran. I recommend you take a look. It’s

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations


Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Watch this

Thanks to Alex Kjerulf for pointing to this remarkable story.

Johnnie Moore

Open Space on Improv in Cambridge

In local news… Clare Kerrison is inviting people to an Open Space on Improv in Cambridge on Saturday afternoon 9 November. I’ll be hosting the process but don’t let that

Johnnie Moore

Organisational culture and its pitfalls

Keith Sawyer says you should avoid recruiting people who “fit your culture” if you want to support innovation. We know from creativity research that the most innovative teams have cognitive diversity.

Johnnie Moore

links for 2011-01-24

BPS Research Digest: Other people may experience more misery than you realise Usual caveat that it's US college students in the sample. But it makes sense to: we kid ourselves