How does branding really happen? (1)

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Among the comments on one of Hugh’s posts I found this gem from Ben Wharton (who doesn’t seem to have a website)(My emphasis)

As someone who has seen the most basic screw-ups occur when outside consultants, especially in the IT industry are brought in to bring a “New Way of Thinking” via a “New Way of Working” promoting “A New Way of Being” into an established business culture you’re staring down the double barrel of the most basic of issues.

While there are generalisations to be made about systems, it’s the multitude of exceptions that describe the realities of an individual system.

I like this statement. And it’s why I think so much of what is said about branding, especially in guides on how to do it, is of such questionable value.

I think what happens is that brands emerge out of the soup. After the event, a large number of Alpha Males lay competing claims to having invented them (success has many parents, failure is an orphan). As the history is written, many happy accidents are reinvented as the results of smart goal setting and thorough planning.

(I used to be a planner in ad agencies; every planner I ever met acknowledged that our real speciality was post-hoc rationalisation of creativity).

All this creates the Myth of the Goal. A story is told that suggests the only way forward for any grown-up organisation is to idealise a future state, compare it with a present state, and do the gap analysis. As Ben so shrewdly observes, that analysis of the present state will very likely fail to capture the multiple, apparently small, details that make any organisation what it is.

Nothing’s perfect, and such an approach has its uses, but I’ve become increasingly wary of idealised visions of the future, and failed acknowledgement of the present, which often serve to depress us and lower our energy and enthusiasm.

For some corporate types, the removal of the Goal Comforter may cause a good deal of anxiety. But for most people, I believe the choice to step more deeply into the present can be a source of creativity and satisfaction. Which raises energy levels, which makes stuff happen.

This is, of course, a far from complete argument. Think of it as a small piece and join it to something else if you like. I’ll be saying more shortly.

Meanwhile, if you’re Ben Wharton, please take a hat tip… and could I persuade you to start blogging?

Share Post

More Posts

Noticing

The power of small gestures and noticing

Small p presence

Getting away from grandiosity or solemnity. small p presence is about being open to the life around us

Small i improv

Facilitation is often about small, subtle acts of noticing and experimenting

Enough

We’re bombarded with messages – can we create more space to think?

February 2025 update

People have been facilitated before: boredom, stillness, recovering attention and the undercurrents of life

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Liminality

Viv McWaters writes about liminality. When you’re asking me to change a particular behaviour (even if it’s for my own good or for the well-being of others, or even the

Johnnie Moore

Nurturing ideas?

I’m just chucking a few small specks of mud at a very big wall here. These loosely related thoughts are on my mind this afternoon. At the end of a

Johnnie Moore

links for 2011-03-23

Proposals for massive expansion of psychological therapies would be counterproductive across society — Summerfield and Veale 192 (5): 326 — The British Journal of Psychiatry Interesting debate Which Traits Predict

Johnnie Moore

links for 2010-09-23

My introduction to systems thinking – a map by Kielhofner | Yes and Space Geoff Brown talks about his original training in occupational therapy and how the "model of human