Proprioception of thought

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

In his book Dialog William Isaacs tells a strange story. A woman wakes in the night to find herself being strangled by an unseen foe. After struggling in the dark, she manages to flick on a light. To her astonishment, she discovers that she is strangling herself with her other arm.

She is the victim of a rare phenomenon, loss of proprioception. Proprioception is the way we can sense where the various bits of our bodies are without having to look at them. We rely on it constantly without even thinking about it. (For instance, when driving, you don’t need to look at your foot on the pedal to know how much acceleration you’re applying.)

Whilst we have ready access to physical proprieception, Isaacs suggests we have largely lost proprieception of our thinking. That is, we don’t notice we’re doing it or the impact it has. We take relatively small amounts of sensory input, make a big meaning and act on that meaning without much pause. In evolutionary terms, clearly a useful skill but it has its downsides.

So in meetings, we start feeling something akin to anxiety and start making a whole lot of assumptions about what others are thinking; we might be right but we can easily be wrong.

I’m increasingly drawn to processes that create a reflective space where our conversation and thinking might slow down enough to regain proprieception. I find it involves going through one or several waves of stress, discomfort and anxiety that I think go with having one of our senses restored. (I suppose it’s a little like walking in from the cold to a warm room – that’s when we shiver the most).

One of the interesting effects of such a shift is a different, I would say richer, sense of connection to those sharing the space with us. I contend it’s a connection that is always there but often goes unnoticed. When it goes unnoticed, we default to a more mechanical notion of how to influence each other and make stuff happen. When we become aware of it, we start to realise that maybe we’re not in such a position of control. That creates a few mental shivers of its own.

Share Post

More Posts

Ghost lights..

feeling the power of presence… and what it really means to ‘read the room.’

Singing on the subway

What I learned singing to strangers on the subway, and why emotional connections matters even more in a hi-tech era.

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Is branding dead?

Hugh Macleod has been saying that Branding is Dead and Doc Searls agrees. Robert Scoble disagrees. Well it all depends on what you mean by branding, and it means different

Johnnie Moore

links for 2010-03-26

Stowe Boyd – /message – Umair Haque Is Another New Spatialist " Without us using Twitter, by the millions, Twitter would just be a bunch of software cogs in a cardboard

Johnnie Moore

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more “sincere” brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!

Johnnie Moore

On being wrong

It’s become a kind of truism these days that we all need to get more forgiving about making mistakes. Perhaps what needs more attention is noticing that we may have