Love and creativity

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Nira Liberman and Oren Shapira explore the relationship between love and creativity. I’m generally excited to see the L word invoked in exploring how new ideas emerge, and the article is full of interesting stuff, raising lots of questions in my head as well as answers. Here’s a chunk of it, but the whole thing is worth a read.

Why does love make us think more globally? The researchers suggest that romantic love induces a long-term perspective, whereas sexual desire induces a short-term perspective. This is because love typically entails wishes and goals of prolonged attachment with a person, whereas sexual desire is typically focused on engaging in sexual activities in the “here and now”. Consistent with this idea, when the researchers asked people to imagine a romantic date or a casual sex encounter, they found that those who imagined dates imagined them as occurring farther into the future than those who imagined casual sex.

The distinction between love and lust is an interesting one – they are often conflated in the way we use the word love, especially in business where it seems to carry a lot of charge. I was intrigued by the researchers’ efforts to separate them. (Andrew Sullivan explores the whole sex/love thing very forthrightly ).

The article continues:

According to construal level theory (CLT), thinking about events that are farther into the future or past – or any kind psychological distancing (such as considering things or people that are physically farther away, or considering remote, unlikely alternatives to reality) triggers a more global processing style. In other words, psychological distancing makes us see the forest rather than the individual trees.

Ok, that part resonates with me and my experience that creativity often requires a reduction in time pressure, or goes with a different sense of time. It makes me think about the practice of holding space. I find the most satsifying creative moments in coaching relationships or meetings seem to arise when there’s least effort to make something happen, more sense of presence and some hard-to-articulate openness to the new. It feels like getting away from problem-solving.

Hat tip: The Frontal Cortex

Share Post

More Posts

Ghost lights..

feeling the power of presence… and what it really means to ‘read the room.’

Singing on the subway

What I learned singing to strangers on the subway, and why emotional connections matters even more in a hi-tech era.

Bunny Bunny

A funny game illustrates what we may be missing in many of our meetings

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Difficult conversations. The clue is in the title.

Chris Rodgers writes: Life in organisations is unavoidably messier and more uncertain than the formal strategies structures systems and processes imply. And yet most discussions of organisational management and leadership

Johnnie Moore

Create your own South Park

Thanks to Jack Yan for spotting this site where you get to create your own South Park character. I’m not sure how this fan site relates to the brand but

Johnnie Moore

Innovation without IP

Tim Kastelle has a great post on Innovation without Intellectual Property Protection prompted by this TED talk by Johanna Blakely. It turns out there are lots of huge industries that

Johnnie Moore

Adaptive conversations

I don’t often write about market research these days. There’s only so much mileage in berating a moribund industry. But I thought Greg Clemenson’s post on adaptive conversations was interesting.