Johnnie Moore

Paying attention

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Consumer Empowerment points to another Economist article relating to open source, partly inspired by Eric von Hippel ‘s Democratizing Innovation. It’s a pretty helpful summary of von Hippel’s arguments.

Traditionally, firms have innovated by sending out market researchers to discover unmet needs among their customers. These researchers report back. The firm decides which ideas to develop and hands them over to project-development teams. Studies suggest that about three-quarters of such projects fail. Harnessing customer innovation requires different methods, says Mr Von Hippel. Instead of taking the temperature of a representative sample of customers, firms must identify the few special customers who innovate.

I find the Economist slant interesting, as with their other recent piece on open sourcing, their support is tempered by a little older-paradigm thinking. Here’s how they end:

At the heart of most thinking about innovation is the belief that people expect to be paid for their creative work: hence the need to protect and reward the creation of intellectual property. One really exciting thing about user-led innovation is that customers seem willing to donate their creativity freely, says Mr Von Hippel. This may be because it is their only practical option: patents are costly to get and often provide only weak protection. Some people may value the enhanced reputation and network effects of freely revealing their work more than any money they could make by patenting it. Either way, some firms are starting to believe that there really is such a thing as a free lunch.

The Economist seem a little amazed at the notion that people might be creative without extrinsic motivation (money) -as if this is some strange new phenomenon. They should read Punished by Rewards.

I’d add that the lunch may be free in the sense that money doesn’t change hands; but the firms that are making user innovation work haven’t got there by doing nothing. they’ve taken some trouble to cultivate their relationships.

For those who like to take about an attention economy, they are paying attention.

I’ve always thought money has always had a rather tempestuous relationship with value, sometimes they go together, often they don’t. Characterising what companies like Lego have done as a kind of free lunch seems to devalue what they and their lead customers have been doing.

(I just did a google image search on paying attention. I was a bit disappointed to find a lot of pictures of students in classrooms. Somehow that doesn’t seem the right way to illustrate the idea any more. Even the one I’ve used here smacks a bit of master-servant, but the dog looks cute.)

Share Post

More Posts


There’s more potential in each moment than we realise

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations


Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

links for 2011-09-08

Technology Provides an Alternative to Love. – Jonathan Franzen on " the dirt that love inevitably splatters on the mirror of our self-regard". Wonderful exposition of the shadow side of

Johnnie Moore

Tolstoy on managment…

Andrew Sullivan quotes Tolstoy: It seems to every administrator that it is only by his efforts that the whole population under his rule is kept going, and in this consciousness

Johnnie Moore

Walking with dinosaurs

James Gardner has some good advice for graduates joining organisations and facing the old hierarchy: Walking with Dinosaurs. ..have a look at your IT organisation and especially at your development