Johnnie Moore

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more "sincere" brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!
Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

My friend in Portland Stanley Moss linked me to this interesting research from Stanford: Highly Trusted Brands Run More Risk of Offending Customers.

Researchers invented a new brand and presented it to two separate groups of consumers. One set got a version with a “sincere” brand personality; the others got an “exciting personality”. The former started emails with “Hello” and the latter with “Hey”. These personalities were carried through all the marketing material.

After a while, the researchers introduced a deliberate mistake in the service, corrected after a couple of days. After which reported “trust” in the sincere brand fell – but actually went up in the exciting brand.

You could look at this and try to form all sorts of explanations of the whys and wherefores. And try to calculate some kind of optimum brand personality and implement it.

My feeling is that could be a mistake. The chemistry of relationships is not easily predicted. I think the best thing is not to try to calculate a personality in the hopes of impressing customers; too difficult. Far better to find out what you really believe and care about as an organisation and present that, authentically. At least then you’ll stand a chance of feeling good. Second-guessing the customer can sometimes be a waste of energy.

Share Post

More Posts

No comment

The value of not always saying something helpful

Beyond writing

Writing stuff down can easily remove us from practical reality and suppress our intuition

Waterfalls and chaos

I linked to this paper on wicked problems the other day and Chris Corrigan commented “there’s a lot in that paper eh?”. Which is true.

Inauthentic marketing: case study

An example of inauthentic direct mail, from Lincoln Financial Group. The elements that eat away at the credibility of the sender and the effect on this reader.

Passion branding

Passion brands bring people together based on common interests and excitements. I’m particularly interested in ones created from the bottom up, as opposed to driven by producers concerned mainly with profit.

Medinge Moments

Just back from another extraordinary gathering at Medinge where the community that has produced Beyond Branding meets each summer. I was planning to keep this

What brand are you?

Thanks to Matt Tucker at Smith Associates for telling me about What Brand Are You. It strikes me that lots of companies waste money on

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations


Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Shallow lessons…

Steve Moore pointed me to this article by John Kay: Shallow lesson of business books. It’s a succinct counterblast to the plethora of “do it like me” business books and

Johnnie Moore


I’ll be taking part in the Chautauqua online discussion of Beyond Branding, from 15th to 29th February. Fellow authors Denzil Meyers, Chris Macrae, Julie Anixter and Jack Yan will also

Johnnie Moore

Palaeolithic wisdom

Ken Thompson enthuses about a Harvard report Virtual Teams: Palaeolithic Insights About the Art of Cyber-Managing. Ken summarises: Three instincts in particular have to be excavated from our caveman days

Johnnie Moore

links for 2010-03-26

Stowe Boyd – /message – Umair Haque Is Another New Spatialist " Without us using Twitter, by the millions, Twitter would just be a bunch of software cogs in a cardboard