Dan Pink gives a punchy TED talk about the adverse impact of incentives. He reports studies that show that offering incentives will increase performance for routine tasks. But for activities that require creativity or problem solving, the bigger the reward, the worse the performance.
Hmm, not quite the worldview prevailing in just about every company I've come across. As he puts it, there's a mismatch between what science knows and what business does.
(Alfie Kohn wrote a brillant book on this subject, Punished by Rewards. I heartily recommend it.)
If you want engagement, self-direction works better. People's intrinsic drive is a far better motivator than extrinsic rewards.
Hat tip: A tweet from David Gurteen

Email me








Facebook/Johnnie Moore
Linkedin/Johnnie Moore
Twitter/johnniemoore
Last.fm/johnniemoore
Del.icio.us/johnniemoore
Technorati/johnniemoore
MyBlogLog/JohnnieM
Blog/Johnnie Moore
Comments (2)
Just one mismatch!!??
August 26, 2009 15:50 Permalink for comment
What is so sad is that this stuff is still a revelation to people running organizations. It was already ancient history when I did my MBA back in the 80's (eg Mary Parker-Follett)
"Science" is part of the problem ... seeing organizational management and behaviour as "scientific" - measurable objective things linked to other measurable objective things - and so things tend to become understood only in terms of things that area easy to measure, ie count, add, subtract - beans for example.
Damn meme.
September 2, 2009 07:55 Permalink for comment