Creepy customer service measurement

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Oscar Wilde famously defined a cynic as a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. I was reminded of this at a bank this morning when I went to the counter to make a transaction. The cashier struggled to get the IT system working but eventually got the job done.

Then she said I might be telephoned later and asked to rate her service… and would I be able to give her a 7? (I overheard another customer being asked the same question; she kindly offered to score a 9 or 10… but apparently 7 was the maximum. Not Spinal Tap then.)

This is the first time I’ve run into this in a live setting but it happens quite a bit with call centres.

I really dislike it. I feel instantly sorry for the staff who I imagine find this a bit demeaning and I know I feel a bit demeaned by it too. It’s as if anonymous management don’t trust either of us to manage a simple human relationship.

If I participate, my answer will almost certainly be a top score as I fear there will be direct repurcussions for the staff otherwise.

The whole thing feels creepy to me. Of course it gives the managerialists yet more numbers over which to pretend influence, but I think their value will be at best much less precise than managers would think. And, as is so often the case with these systems, there is no measure of the downsides that can’t be measured but are real – for staff and customer morale.

I don’t much like being lured into this kind of game and I realise I’m not going to play next time.

I am not a number, and neither are the people behind the counter.

Share Post

More Posts

Rambling thoughts on models

I went down to Surrey on Friday for long walk and pub lunch with Neil Perkin. We’d originally planned to run a workshop about agile

Planning as drowning

Antonio Dias offers a fascinating description of what goes wrong when drowning: What separates a swimmer from someone drowning is the way a swimmer acknowledges

Leadership as holding uncertainty

Viv picks out some nice ideas from Phelim McDermott on the subject of leadership. “We love the security of the illusion that someone is in

Concreting Complexity

I’ve been thinking about the urge to scale things lately – see here and here. I understand the concern with being able to effect big

The absurd

In moving house, I radically downsized my collection of books which I can highly recommend. I used to think I’d one day find a reason

Rewriting history…

Thanks to my Improvisation friend Kelsey Flynn I rambled into a letter cited in Margaret Cho’s Blog (go to Letter #1): Lately it seems like

Who says fun is dangerous?

I wanted to share this email doing the rounds this morning… AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE After every flight Qantas pilots fill out a form called a gripe

And I thought there was only one

Suddenly there’s another John Moore marketing blog. I realise I’m a bit of an addict for this, but this latest is not mine. It’s produced

Thoughts for the day

These came to be via Tony Quinlan from Terry Tillman at 227company. “You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

On the edge of failure

Alexis Soloski suggests we shouldn’t be too bothered if the star of the show is replaced by an understudy. And it’s often been my experience that understudies perform as well

Johnnie Moore

Word of the day

Paul Levy came up with a word in a comment to his post about “icebreakers”. Some briefs might translate as “can you facilitate for these people to do what I

Johnnie Moore

Google’s rise

David Burn at Adpulp marvels at the meteoric growth of Google’s advertising. Who would have thought that their “fortune cookies” would fare so well against the creative might of Madison

Johnnie Moore

Blaming less, learning more

Matthew Syed has a powerful article in The Guardian highlighting the toxic effects of blame on organisations. A bureaucratic over-reaction to errors is hugely counter-productive. Too much rigidity in pursuit