Johnnie Moore

Scoble’s firestorm

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I didn’t realise when I praised Robert Scoble the other day that I was stepping into a little internet firestorm. A couple of burning embers can be found in the comments and you’ll find plenty more on the Scoble blog.

Some have focussed on the idea Scoble described and picked plenty of holes in it. Others are understandably massively sceptical about whether the Microsoft behemoth can ever really adopt open source.

I’ll just reaffirm that it’s great that this employee is supported in being this open about his thinking. And I think it’s a straw in the wind: businesses are more porous than ever – something that far too much branding ignores in favour of simplistic messaging.

And I’ll fillet this from Scoble’s own argument

I’m very fortunate to work for a company that encourages me to try things. In public. When humans try things occassionally they’ll fail… And don’t think Microsoft is alone. Silicon Valley is scattered with such courtyards. The failures. Oh the failures! But out of those failures comes Apple. Comes Intel. Comes Google. Comes eBay. Comes Cisco. Comes Yahoo. Yeah, everyone knows the big successes, but really, it’s the failures that teach us things.

Yes, my idea was wacky. Yes, it is a stupid, idiotic, naive idea. But I learned a lot. In all of the discussion there was more product feedback about music players turned over to the world than would have been gained from 20 customer feedback sessions.

So, the stupid idea got you all to talk. Is that a bad thing?

Share Post

More Posts

Waterfalls and chaos

I linked to this paper on wicked problems the other day and Chris Corrigan commented “there’s a lot in that paper eh?”. Which is true.

Medinge Moments

Just back from another extraordinary gathering at Medinge where the community that has produced Beyond Branding meets each summer. I was planning to keep this

Passion branding

Passion brands bring people together based on common interests and excitements. I’m particularly interested in ones created from the bottom up, as opposed to driven by producers concerned mainly with profit.

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more “sincere” brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!

What brand are you?

Thanks to Matt Tucker at Smith Associates for telling me about What Brand Are You. It strikes me that lots of companies waste money on

Just Undo It?

The AntiBrand: blackSpot sneakers, a project by Adbusters attacks Nike directly. In doing so they take on what has become one of the great icons

Putting humanity into branding

We live in a world of too much marketing and too much branding. People’s faith in advertising has fallen to new lows as we simply

New Abbey

So the Abbey National is rebranding itself this morning. As I write this entry, they are revealing their new look, their shortened name (just “Abbey”)

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Finding personal meaning

Nick Smith has a good post challenging conventional wisdom on leadership and team building. This particularly caught my attention: Instead of pursuing the impossible task of getting everyone to commit

Johnnie Moore

Trances

There seems to have been a lot of political leaders looking foolish lately. We look at their actions and explanations and wonder how they ended up there. I guess because

Johnnie Moore

Cheerfulness not needed to be happy!

Whoa! The delightful Bernie de Koven points to this provocative bit of research: Pleasure, Meaning and Eudaimonia from the Authentic Happiness Newsletter. (I haven’t met Eudaimonia or her sister Hedonia

Johnnie Moore

Interior transformation

Chris Corrigan has some great things to say about interior versus exterior transformation. One of the reasons why “change management” fails is because a small group of people undergoes a