In praise of um… er….. deeper meaning

Once again, it turns out that what we do naturally has more value than we realise; whereas clever contrivances intended to "improve" our effectiveness often just destroy significance... and make us less well understood! A good lesson for all those presentation trainers and "image consultants" out there!
Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Gary L Murphy blogs these delightful insights on the value of those ums and ers which pepper our speech.

There’s also waaaaay more to language than what Mrs Whazzername taught back in Grade 5. Much more. There’s a subtle fluidity of invention beyond the reach of grammar books and a word-sound-power that only our neural pathways truly understand like the ways r-uff and r-ough are subjectively identical and yet native english speakers learn to produce the two very electrically different sounds.

And so too with, you know, those, like, interjection things, y’know? According to new research Earl tells us was just published in Nature, science is on my side: ‘Er’ cautions listeners to stay on side; ‘Ums’ and ‘uhs’ contain meaning. Right on.

Once again, it turns out that what we do naturally has more value than we realise; whereas clever contrivances intended to “improve” our effectiveness often just destroy significance. A good lesson for all those presentation trainers and “image consultants” out there!

Share Post

More Posts

February 2025 update

People have been facilitated before: boredom, stillness, recovering attention and the undercurrents of life

No comment

The value of not always saying something helpful

Beyond writing

Writing stuff down can easily remove us from practical reality and suppress our intuition

Inauthentic marketing: case study

An example of inauthentic direct mail, from Lincoln Financial Group. The elements that eat away at the credibility of the sender and the effect on this reader.

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more “sincere” brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!

Authenticity: you can’t fake it

Thanks (again) to John Porcaro for linking me to the Customer Evangelists’ blog where I found this: OLD SCHOOL: Ad agency pays teen bloggers to

Follies of ranking

John Porcaro blogsmore evidence of the dangers of running businesses by crude interpretations of numbers… how superficial metrics can cover a rich tapestry of human

Values – ideal or real

I am blogging from my friend Thomas’s office in Essex. All around are those inspirational posters… eg “PERSISTENCE Now that we’ve exhausted all possibilities… let’s

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

TypeKey

I like MovableType (the software I blog with), and I like Six Apart, the guys who created it. It’s a good piece of software and it has a great support

Johnnie Moore

The opposite of hype

Adrian Trenholm points to Bessemer Venture Partners Anti Portfolio. Essentially a list of their big mistakes. I agree with Adrian, it’s a good example of marketing that avoids the presentation

Johnnie Moore

Open Office

Olaf Brugman has tried Open Office for 60 days and he’s not going back to Microsoft Office. Seems he’s happy with replacements for Word Excel and Powerpoint. This is something

Johnnie Moore

Reflecting on facilitation

I enjoyed listening to Andrew Rixon’s chat with Sandy Schuman. You can listen to the mp3 here. This part of the reflective practice on the language of facilitation. He’s organising