
Branding used to be about polishing and smoothing, to make shiny images of products and services that we'd all admire.
These shiny things would have USPs, propositions and such. There'd be manuals to try and make sure everyone kept to the script, to achieve perfection.
But shiny things have a problem: they don't generate much friction. They're hard to hold onto. And you don't want people's fingerprints to spoil the look. The laminate on the glossy brochure is like a glass case at the museum: look, but don't touch.

Now branding needs to celebrate the rough... the inconsistent... different people saying different things about different bits of you.
It's not as pretty and easy to control... but it's how you create friction, how you create more and more places where your product or service can get a bit of traction with the rest of us.

Email me








Facebook/Johnnie Moore
Linkedin/Johnnie Moore
Twitter/johnniemoore
Last.fm/johnniemoore
Del.icio.us/johnniemoore
Technorati/johnniemoore
MyBlogLog/JohnnieM
Blog/Johnnie Moore
Comments (3)
Hi Johnnie.
Great posts today.
This in particular.
Think what you've hit on is the difference between machines (old-paradigm) and Go human-networks (new paradigm)
Taylorism vs 2.0.
Go outside now...
Sun shine etc.
April 14, 2007 16:28 Permalink for comment
Love the metaphor! Very well said indeed Johnnie.
April 15, 2007 01:03 Permalink for comment
Really like this post Johnnie.
It gets at the necessary incompleteness of a brand, something I reflected on not too long ago.
A brand dare not be perfect...or so perfect that no one dare leave their fingerprints on it. It needs to be incomplete. Rough. Human.
Thanks for enlarging the conversation.
Keep creating,
Mike
April 17, 2007 04:14 Permalink for comment