Change This…

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

James and I have penned a new manifesto for Change This: Co-Creation Rules

Regular readers will know that I’m no fan of lists. I’m not renowned for making rules either though you’ll understand we’re being deliberately ambiguous in our title.

Nevertheless, James and thought we’d try and bash out a few ideas that we sometimes use in our work trying to help organisations get their heads round marketing these days. We’ve focussed more on corporates and marketing in this, but the general ideas carry over into over areas too. Here are the opening paras:

We no longer live in a world where people instinctively trust authority. As much social research shows, we’d rather trust our own instincts and the information we learn from our friends. For organisations and brands, this ain’t Kansas anymore. In our social world, it’s better to be talked about by others than to try to out-shout the crowd.

If we have to choose between engagement and control, we prefer engagement. We think that organisations in the future will do well to have the same preference when it comes to dealing with their own people and their customers.

I’ve shamelessly reused a game I described in More Space as part of this, partly in an effort to make this a bit more experiential and less academic.

We might think of this a first draft… and we’d be interested to know how people would change this to make it more useful… You can download it here.

(Thanks to Change This, especially Sally Haldorson, for their support and to John Winsor for some very useful ideas for the content. This mistakes are all ours, of course.)

—–

Share Post

More Posts

Waterfalls and chaos

I linked to this paper on wicked problems the other day and Chris Corrigan commented “there’s a lot in that paper eh?”. Which is true.

Passion branding

Passion brands bring people together based on common interests and excitements. I’m particularly interested in ones created from the bottom up, as opposed to driven by producers concerned mainly with profit.

Medinge Moments

Just back from another extraordinary gathering at Medinge where the community that has produced Beyond Branding meets each summer. I was planning to keep this

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more “sincere” brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!

What brand are you?

Thanks to Matt Tucker at Smith Associates for telling me about What Brand Are You. It strikes me that lots of companies waste money on

Just Undo It?

The AntiBrand: blackSpot sneakers, a project by Adbusters attacks Nike directly. In doing so they take on what has become one of the great icons

Putting humanity into branding

We live in a world of too much marketing and too much branding. People’s faith in advertising has fallen to new lows as we simply

New Abbey

So the Abbey National is rebranding itself this morning. As I write this entry, they are revealing their new look, their shortened name (just “Abbey”)

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Noticing

Following up on WH Auden here’s R D Laing: “The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to

Johnnie Moore

The anti-gladwell?

Guy Kawasaki’s picks up on Duncan Watts’ very provocative research on network effects: Forget the A-list after all. (I wrote about Watts’ stuff here and here last year.) Watts is

Johnnie Moore

Which pool would you swim in?

Rob put up a great post the other day making a whole load of challenging points about how see the world. I want to pick a couple of his images